The North Shore Arts Association directs your immediate attention to an important subject for all artists: the ownership and copyrights to their own images. An email
from the Illustrators Partnership has come to the attention of the NSAA
Board through a number of our colleagues and Professional Associations. It speaks about the resurrection of Orphan Works in the latest US
Copyright legislation that will be going before Congress soon. We
want to alert our membership to the implications of the legislation
as they apply to your artwork.
Below are the contact numbers for our legislators and the text of the email from the Illustrators Partnership.
Theodore.Speliotis@mahouse.gov
seth@sethmoulton.com
Bruce E. Tarr, Senate Minority Leader
Massachusetts State House, Room 308
Phone: (617) 722-1600
Fax: (617) 722-1310
Artists Alert: From the Illustrators Partnership
The Return of Orphan Works
Part 1: "The Next Great Copyright Act"
JULY 1, 2015
|
For
more than a year Congress has been holding hearings for the drafting of
a brand new US Copyright Act. At its heart is the return of Orphan
Works.
Twice,
Orphan Works Acts have failed to pass Congress because of strong
opposition from visual artists, spearheaded by the Illustrators
Partnership.
Because
of this, the Copyright Office has now issued a special call for letters
regarding the role of visual art in the coming legislation.
Therefore we're asking all artists concerned with retaining the rights to their work to join us in writing.
|
When and Where
Deadline: July 23, 2015
You can submit letters online to the Copyright Office here.
|
|
Here are the Basic Facts
- "The Next Great Copyright Act" would replace all existing copyright law.
- It would void our Constitutional right to the exclusive control of our work.
- It would "privilege" the public's right to use our work.
- It would "pressure" you to register your work with commercial registries.
- It would "orphan" unregistered work.
- It would make orphaned work available for commercial infringement by "good faith" infringers.
- It would allow others to alter your work and copyright these "derivative works" in their own names.
- It
would affect all visual art: drawings, paintings, sketches, photos,
etc.; past, present and future; published and unpublished; domestic and
foreign.
|
Background
- The demand for copyright "reform" has
come from large Internet firms and the legal scholars allied with them.
Their business models involve supplying the public with access to other
people's copyrighted work. Their problem has been how to do this
legally and without paying artists.
- The
"reforms" they've proposed would allow them to stock their databases
with our pictures. This would happen either by forcing us to hand over
our images to them as registered works, or by harvesting unregistered
works as orphans and copyrighting them in their own names as "derivative
works."
- The
Copyright Office acknowledges that this will cause special problems for
visual artists but concludes that we should still be subject to orphan
works law.
The "Next Great Copyright Act" would go further than previous Orphan Works Acts. The proposals under consideration include:
1.) The Mass Digitization of our intellectual property by corporate interests.
2.) Extended Collective Licensing, a form of socialized licensing that would replace voluntary business agreements between artists and their clients.
3.) A Copyright Small Claims Court to handle the flood of lawsuits expected to result from orphan works infringements.
|
In your letter to the Copyright Office:
It's important that lawmakers be told that our copyrights
are our source of income because lobbyists and corporation lawyers have
"testified" that once our work has been published it has virtually no
further commercial value and should therefore be available for use by
the public.
So when writing, please remember:
- It's important that you make your letter personal and truthful.
- Keep it professional and respectful.
- Explain that you're an artist and have been one for x number of years.
- Briefly list your educational background, publications, awards, etc.
- Indicate the field(s) you work in.
- Explain clearly and forcefully that for you, copyright law is not an abstract legal issue, but the basis on which your business rests.
- Our copyrights are the products we license.
- This means that infringing our work is like stealing our money.
- It's important to our businesses that we remain able to determine
voluntarily how and by whom our work is used.
-
- Stress that your work does NOT lose its value upon publication.
- Instead everything you create becomes part of your business inventory.
- In the digital era, inventory is more valuable to artists than ever before.
If you are NOT a professional artist:
- Define your specific interest in copyright, and give a few relevant details.
- You might want to stress that it's important to you that you determine how and by whom your work is used.
- You
might wish to state that even if you're a hobbyist, you would not
welcome someone else monetizing your work for their own profit without
your knowledge or consent.
|
|
Because this is a complicated issue, we'll follow up next week with some expanded thoughts of our own.
- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner
for the Board of the Illustrators Partnership
|
The Illustrators Partnership has filed multiple papers with the
Copyright Office regarding this issue .
You can download them from the Copyright Office website:
January 17, 2012
Initial Comments, February 3, 2013
Reply Comments, March 6, 2013
Additional Comments, May 21, 2014
